Where are you?
  • Austria
  • Belgium
  • Denmark
  • Finland
  • France
  • Germany
  • Guernsey
  • Ireland
  • Italy
  • Jersey
  • Luxembourg
  • Malta
  • Netherlands
  • Norway
  • Portugal
  • Spain
  • Singapore
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • United Kingdom
  • Rest of World
It looks like you’re in
Not your location?
And finally, please confirm the following details
I’m {role} in {country} and I agree to comply with the terms of the website.
You are viewing as from Change

Kamalanomics or Trump trade?

Past performance does not predict future returns. You may get back less than you originally invested. Reference to specific securities is not intended as a recommendation to purchase or sell any investment.
 
  • More tax and homes under Harris
  • Trump wants tax cuts, deregulation and tariffs
  • Valuations supersede politics in US

The contest for the US presidential election in November is gathering momentum following the selection of Kamala Harris as the Democratic candidate. Many issues will be at stake as she faces off against Donald Trump, but to what extent could the economic policies pursued over the next four years in the world’s richest country be decisive for investors?

Tax cuts, deregulation and tariffs

Both candidates have already shown their economic colours to some extent – Trump through his first term as president and Harris in the last four years as vice president.

Trump’s policies are expected to be a continuation of those seen during his presidency, namely tax cuts, deregulation and international trade barriers.1

His Tax Cuts and Jobs Act 2017 cut corporate tax from 35% to 21% and provided temporary cuts for individuals to stimulate economic growth. His administration focused on deregulating various industries, especially energy and finance, with the former seeing environmental regulations rolled back to boost the fossil fuel industry. There are question marks over whether there will be as much scope for fiscal largesse as last time, should Trump win.

Trump’s presidency represented a tilt towards a more hawkish stance on China, which President Biden also embraced. Trump’s most anti-free market policy was the imposition of tariffs on imports, especially from China, while the strict immigration restrictions he imposed were another example of his protectionism towards US jobs and wages.

More tax, homes and workers’ rights

For Harris, a key question is the extent to which she will continue the policies of the Biden administration while distancing herself from the cost of living crisis that happened during it.2 Her policies focus on empowering the middle class, ensuing affordable healthcare and housing, imposing more progressive taxation and reducing income inequality through providing broader economic support.2

Her housing initiative includes building three million new housing units with tax incentives for builders of affordable homes, while she would also extend the Biden administration’s efforts to cut the cost of prescription medication. She wants to give more rights to workers to organise and bargain collectively, create jobs by promoting investment in the US and lower the costs of childcare, education and long-term care.

Comparing the two

Much could be said about the potential relative impacts of both candidates’ economic policies. 

The failed attempt on Trump’s life led to a bump in the polls which resulted in a brief ‘Trump trade’. The US dollar and stocks moved higher while 10-year treasuries dipped on greater expectations that his presidency would lead to greater government spending, looser regulations and corporate tax cuts.3

On the other hand, Harris’s home-building plans could be seen as supportive of the housing industry. Although her policies could be seen as more pro-international trade, it should be remembered that the Biden administration continued the anti-Chinese restrictions imposed by Trump that resulted in trade wars and higher prices for consumers. This anti-China stance could be understood to be an essential ‘American’ policy to reduce reliance on China in an increasingly multi-polar world. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the Covid-19 pandemic illustrated the important of this.

Sticking to our process

Whatever the outcome from what looks set to be a very close presidential race, our approach to investing globally, and indeed in the US will stay the same. We do not expect political machinations to have a material impact on the long-term prospects of major asset classes. Over the long run, the US stock market has risen on average, whatever the permutation of government, senate and house of representatives. US businesses are run to generate profits for shareholders regardless of the political winds. Inevitably, new governments bring change, and there will be winners and losers because of those changes, but a diversified basket of stocks should provide long run returns in line with historical norms for the equity market. 

If the US were an unpredictable, politically unstable country then more attention would likely need to be paid to election noise. But the US is a centrist, democratic country where rule of law is respected. This means it is more appropriate to base investment decisions on valuations of assets and long-term fundamentals – which is an integral part of our investment process.

Where possible, we make use of active managers to provide access to stock picking skill which should help to identify potential beneficiaries of any political change and we ensure all of our funds and portfolios retain a significant level of diversification to ensure they are not overly sensitive to any single risk factor, such as an election result. 

1Source: Wikipedia

2Source: Cutting costs at great cost, The Economist, 24 August 2024

3Source: Reuters, 15 July 2024

Understand common financial words and terms See our glossary
KEY RISKS

Past performance is not a guide to future performance. The value of an investment and the income generated from it can fall as well as rise and is not guaranteed. You may get back less than you originally invested.

The issue of units/shares in Liontrust Funds may be subject to an initial charge, which will have an impact on the realisable value of the investment, particularly in the short term. Investments should always be considered as long term.

The Funds and Model Portfolios managed by the Multi-Asset Team may be exposed to the following risks: Credit Risk: There is a risk that an investment will fail to make required payments and this may reduce the income paid to the fund, or its capital value. The creditworthiness of a bond issuer may also affect that bond's value. Bonds that produce a higher level of income usually also carry greater risk as such bond issuers may have difficulty in paying their debts. The value of a bond would be significantly affected if the issuer either refused to pay or was unable to pay; Counterparty Risk: The insolvency of any institutions providing services such as safekeeping of assets or acting as counterparty to derivatives or other instruments, may expose the Fund to financial loss; Liquidity Risk: If underlying funds suspend or defer the payment of redemption proceeds, the Fund's ability to meet redemption requests may also be affected; Interest Rate Risk: Fluctuations in interest rates may affect the value of the Fund and your investment. Bonds are affected by changes in interest rates and their value and the income they generate can rise or fall as a result; Derivatives Risk: Some of the underlying funds may invest in derivatives, which can, in some circumstances, create wider fluctuations in their prices over time; Emerging Markets: The Fund may invest in less economically developed markets (emerging markets) which can involve greater risks than well developed economies; Currency Risk: The Fund invests in overseas markets and the value of the Fund may fall or rise as a result of changes in exchange rates. Index Tracking Risk: The performance of any passive funds used may not exactly track that of their Indices. Any performance shown in respect of the Model Portfolios are periodically restructured and/or rebalanced. Actual returns may vary from the model returns.

The risks detailed above are reflective of the full range of Funds managed by the Multi-Asset Team and not all of the risks listed are applicable to each individual Fund. For the risks associated with an individual Fund, please refer to its Key Investor Information Document (KIID)/PRIIP KID.

DISCLAIMER

This is a marketing communication. Before making an investment, you should read the relevant Prospectus and the Key Investor Information Document (KIID), which provide full product details including investment charges and risks. These documents can be obtained, free of charge, from www.liontrust.co.uk or direct from Liontrust. Always research your own investments. If you are not a professional investor please consult a regulated financial adviser regarding the suitability of such an investment for you and your personal circumstances.

This should not be construed as advice for investment in any product or security mentioned, an offer to buy or sell units/shares of Funds mentioned, or a solicitation to purchase securities in any company or investment product. Examples of stocks are provided for general information only to demonstrate our investment philosophy. The investment being promoted is for units in a fund, not directly in the underlying assets. It contains information and analysis that is believed to be accurate at the time of publication, but is subject to change without notice. Whilst care has been taken in compiling the content of this document, no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made by Liontrust as to its accuracy or completeness, including for external sources (which may have been used) which have not been verified. It should not be copied, forwarded, reproduced, divulged or otherwise distributed in any form whether by way of fax, email, oral or otherwise, in whole or in part without the express and prior written consent of Liontrust.

More from the team

See all related
James Klempster James Klempster
Kamalanomics or Trump trade? The contest for the next US presidency is gathering momentum. To what extent might the candidates’ economic policies be decisive for investors?
icon 11 September 2024
American flag
James Klempster James Klempster
Turmoil in Japan? Tokyo’s Nikkei fell 25.5% peak to trough in July and August. Have Japanese equities’ fundamentals changed?
icon 27 August 2024
John Husselbee John Husselbee
Managing the summer turbulence
icon 23 August 2024
Plane taking off with clear skies and rising sun in background